Home>Editorial>Opinion>The wage of ‘lobby’ grants

The wage of ‘lobby’ grants

It’s all about bucks, kid. The rest is conversation. — Wall Street

Just what part of “NO” the agency doesn’t understand?

When it comes to pass, its officials only have themselves to blame.

It’s a logical, natural consequence of, payback for a prohibited act.

It is prescribed by law: Republic Act 6713 bans the solicitation or acceptance of gifts.

More importantly, it is morally repugnant. Proverbs 15:27, states that: “Whoever is greedy for unjust gain troubles his own household, but he who hates bribes will live.”

It is, quite simply, unethical and illegal, stupid!

And so consumer groups said they plan to file graft charges before the Ombudsman against the officials of Food and Drugs Administration who confirmed in a public hearing that they received grants from foreign vested interest groups.

Anton Israel, president of the Nicotine Consumers Union of the Philippines, warned: “If the FDA would continue to ignore the views and rights of legitimate and impacted stakeholders and proceeds with the adoption of an administrative order lifted from the playbook of their anti-tobacco patrons, we would be constrained to file an anti-graft case with the Ombudsman.”

Israel said the FDA’s admission of acceptance of the grant is a clear case of conflict of interest — driven solely by financial considerations.

“We know this government is uncompromising with corruption and President Duterte will not tolerate this abuse of authority,” he said.

Clarisse Virgino, the Philippine representative to the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates, said: “We were shocked and aghast by the admission of the FDA that they received money from the Union and Bloomberg Initiative.”

“These groups [Union and Bloomberg Initiative] are known advocates of prohibition for all forms of tobacco products, including better alternatives to cigarettes like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products,” she said.

“We are saddened to hear that the proposed FDA guidelines on the regulation of vapor products was based on the recommendations of only the public health NGOs, we (vapers and industry) are the ones most affected with these guidelines and should be heard and considered also,” Joey Dulay, president of the Philippine E-Cigarette Industry Association, said during the last FDA public hearing.

On October 6 and 8, the FDA conducted virtual public consultations on the general guidelines for e-cigs and HTPs, respectively, which the participating stakeholders described as “a lecture, more than a consultation”.

The agency confirmed during the discussion on HTPs that it received grants from The Union and Bloomberg Initiative when confronted by Nueva Ecija Rep. Estrellita Suansing.

With the shocking admission, Deputy House Speaker Deogracias Victor Savellano moved to initiate a full-blown House of Representatives investigation on the FDA.

“Upon questioning by Congress representatives present in the hearing, it came out that the FDA has been receiving financial grants of Bloomberg, basing guidelines on medical NGO’s who are known anti-vapor groups. (This) shows partiality. We would like to humbly request FDA for a more fair and impartial conduct of the drafting of the guidelines. That is all we ask, so we may work things together hand in hand please,” Dulay said.

In a statement, Virgino reminded the FDA that the solicitation or acceptance of gifts is prohibited under RA 6713, or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, especially if it involves a piece of regulation.

“Section 7 of RA 6713 prohibits public officials and employees from soliciting or accepting, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of monetary value from any person in the course of their official duties or in connection with any operation being regulated by, or any transaction which may be affected by the functions of their office. It is clear that funds received from anti-vaping groups would jeopardize FDA’s treatment of tobacco harm reduction products such as e-cigarettes and HTPs,” she said.

The agency as a regulator, according to Virgino, is supposed to be an independent body free from influence of any foreign or local institution that tries to push their own interests.

“It is supposed to safeguard public health, and not become a subordinate to moneyed foreign groups,” she said.

Virgino said that the Administrative Order drafted by the FDA, if adopted, would virtually constitute a de-facto ban on vapes and HTPs.

“The FDA agenda is crystal clear. For the 16 million Filipino smokers, the only option is to quit or die. To the one million vapers, go back to smoking cigarettes.”

“This is the height of irresponsibility for a government agency when we all know there are options for those who can’t quit cigarettes,” Israel said.

Israel said that “without better alternatives to cigarettes, smokers are only presented with the choice—quit or die.” He said that as a vaper, “If the FDA restricts vaping products, I would definitely go back exclusively to cigarettes.”

Light up and let die? Is this the way to go, FDA?

Behold God’s glory and seek HIs mercy.

Pause and pray, people.

Publication Source :    People's Journal